Battle vs Chess это шахматы с красиво анимированными фигурами и динамичными боями. В игре на ваш выбор будут представлены шесть территорий, на которых вам придется стоять лицом к лицу против големов и химер.
Battle vs Chess это шахматы с красиво анимированными фигурами и динамичными боями. В игре на ваш выбор будут представлены шесть территорий, на которых вам придется стоять лицом к лицу против големов и химер.
(San Francisco, CA and Karlsruhe, Germany) August 17, 2012 – TopWare Interactive is thrilled to announce the long awaited release of Check vs. Mate on Steam® yesterday for $19.99/€19.9
Комментарий(75)
Biscoit Oct 31.2013
awesome game! never played the amiga verosin but after the glowing review on toucharcade, I figured this was a must buy and it is!however, I would say that the d-pad is singularly bad for touch devices. lack of tactile feedback makes it next to impossible. any chance of an analog stick like controller instead? the stick in death rally is close to perfect or as perfect as possible in a touch device. also, the tilt control doesn't translate well to this game because of the fixed rate of movement. there seems to be a disconnect between intent and effect. the touch control is great and is TRULY GENIUS in the way it's implemented so that you can change the offset between finger and ship. alas, I keep blocking my iPhone view.anyway, great game. rock on. jin
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
26, 2010, 07:21) Yes, intelligence can be svbcejtiue. But, more in terms of how or in whatway. Determing such would depend on having a conversation with theperson in question prior to asking them out. Rather than takinginventory of their physical attributes and straight for the first date.Which would then depend on where your male relative goes hunting' really.Few people (me included!) carry their degree diploma around with them so if he's after inteligence (subject to that intelligence matching the intelligence he's after) he should be searching amongst his peer group or his social circle.If he regularly trawls nightclubs, well, not suggesting that club chicks aint intelligent, far from it, but they might not necessarily be of the intelligence he's seeking, but they sure will be easy on the eye make for great arm candy!I go straight for looks&physical attributes every time, while pretty intelligent, both in the paper qualifications&street know how, the one thing I personally wouldn't be interested in a partner is a purely academic intelligence..simply because in general terms, the women into pure mathematics for example, aren't all that interested in fashion&appearances & really wouldn't be interested in a tattooist such as myself, simply because of their preconcieved notions about my profession & my appearance .I say general terms' as there are no doubt PhD's in quantum physics who are totally gorgeous, both male & female, but, as being gorgeous & looking good take time, as does getting a PhD in quantum physics, something's gonna have to give, & if quantum physics is their big thing, it's gonna be looking good that takes a back seat.I look pretty good, but my quantum physics knowledge is rubbish see what I mean?!True, a tattoo studio would seem an unlikely place to find intelligent' & good looking people, & yet, it's where I found very intelligent & very lovley EJ & she found the devillishly good looking & much smarter than the average bear, me!It could be that your male realative finds fault where none exists & the fault might actually lie with him, by rejecting someone for not being intelligent enough' although they stack up well in physical attributes.Is he an intellectual Tyrannosaurus where anyone outside of a very select group of female professors would forever be in his vastly superior intellectual shadow?Or does he actually shy away from really smart women, in case they might show up the cracks in his maybe not quite so devasting intelligence, giving him scope to reject them on a flimsy reason that's not easy to really quantify by a third party?Food for thought.
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1'"
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
2
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1 and sleep(4)
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1 or (sleep(4)+1) limit 1 --
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
@@a68kk
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1' and sleep(4)='
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
JyI=
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1' and (sleep(4)+1) limit 1 --
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
?'?"
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
e''e""
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1" and sleep(4)="
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1' or (sleep(4)+1) limit 1 --
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1" or (sleep(4)+1) limit 1 --
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1'=sleep(4)='
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1"=sleep(4)="
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1; waitfor delay '0:0:4' --
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1'; waitfor delay '0:0:4' --
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1"; waitfor delay '0:0:4' --
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Anonymous Oct 31.2013
1
Stranice